Now I’m pissed at you McDougal Littell

Early in the year I submitted a letter I’d written to McDougal Littell, the company that published the literature anthology we’re now using in my district. The letter was full of flowery praise, and I truly meant every word of it.

But a few days ago, McDougal Littell, I found myself seething. I’ve had to wait three days to write this, because I want you to know you made a gigantic mistake in your anthology.

Nope. It’s not a factual mistake, haven’t found one of those yet. Nope, it’s not a spelling mistake, though there are a few of those. The mistake came in the production of the student version of the anthology — what I like to call the “green floppy book.” Every day the kids head to my class asking: “Do we need our green floppy books today?” And that’s pretty cool to hear because it means the kids are actually interested in using these materials in class. And maybe that has something to do with the fact that this is the first time they’ve had a Language Arts book they could take outside of the classroom.

But they’re kids and they didn’t see the problem they held in their hands and stuffed into their backpacks every day. I’m sorry to say I didn’t notice it myself until the very moment the problem showed itself in my classroom. The problem comes in your printing of the play “The Diary of Anne Frank.”

When you printed the play in the hardcover anthology, you filled it full of information and pictures. You gave the kids faces to look at, and with those images the kids kept making statements in class like: “That must be Dussel because he’s sitting down, and in this part of the play the guy showed up and was tired and bewildered. It must be dussel.” “Yeah, you can tell who everybody is because of how they’re described in the play.” That’s powerful stuff right there, because to make decisions like that, the kids had to connect with the text; they had to have a communication with the anthology.

Another way the kids show me their connection with the anthology was when they got into reading the play using the different formats you gave us with the books — we started off listening to the audio version performed by professional actors, we moved into reading the play aloud, and then we got into moving the actors around and here’s what I found the kids doing: instead of choosing who would read the play each day (or only letting those interested in reading aloud perform), I made the kids choose each other. Whomever played Anne one day would have to choose the next day’s reader, and so on. This worked wonderfully because after a few days of doing this, the kids really got into their performances, and they were modelling their readings after the actors they’d heard in the play. And if you know 8th graders (that’s somehting that’ll come up in a minute here), you know that reading aloud in front of others and putting your own emotion into it is an embarrassing thing. It’s never done. I give credit there to the original authors.

I also give credit to the original uthors — that includes Anne Frank — for crapturing a story that cuts right to the hearts of my students. They’ve never been more interested in reading. They’ve never been more interested in listening. When we were reading the play aloud, I would butt in to ask questions and they would groan: “Can’t we just move on?” And when we listened to the audio version you provided they had their faces in their books, all turning pages at the same time, and only raised their heads when I paused the audio to ask another question. I’m thankful that you provided me with several versions of this play so that I can keep the kids’ interest as much as possible. I’m thankful for having the opportunity to move ot the audio selection again when the students lost steam in performing.

But imagine how unpleased I was when I asked the students to read alone to the End of Act 1 in their green floppy books and heard the next day:

“Yeah, I finished the play.”

Oh, wow! You read that far ahead. You must’ve been pretty caught up in the story.

“No, I read to where you told us to read. That’s the end of the play.”

Huh?

“It goes to Hanukah, and that’s the end of the play. Is that all she wrote in her diary? I thought we were going to read about her going to the concentration camps.”

No, she didn’t get the opportunity to take her diary with her, but wait a second. Let me see your floppy book.

Leafing through the floppy book, I noted all those things I initially loved about it — the space in the sidebars to take notes, the selections of text circled and annotated for ectra information, the questions that pop up every now and again, and the prompts that ask students to “pause & reflect” on what they’ve read. I flipped through Act 1 and quickly came to the “end of the play.” Yeah. The play just stops at the end of Act 1, Scene 3, where Mr. Dussel comes to stay with the family.

And that’s it. Play’s over. Nothing more to see here. They must have lived happily ever after. Move along.

One major hint I should have noticed about this abridged version of the play (no wait, abbridged would mean you cut the text to pieces and got rid of the extraneous stuff — if you’d abridged the text, the gist of the entire story would be there) is that the title in the floppy book reads: “from the Diary of Anne Frank,” where the word “from” notes that the whole story’s not there.

I should have noticed that “from” a long time ago. That’s my own fault. You got me there. What really angers m, though, is the little statement you put in the floppy book at the end of Act 1, Scene 3 that reads something akin to:

If you have a copy of the full McDougal Littell Anthology, please continue reading the play at scene 4 on page 484.

How awful of you to exhibit right there in the kids’ books the fact that a school probably can’t afford the actual anthology. The kids already complain that most of their books are old and falling apart; they know that schools don’t have an awful lot of money. Don’t give them the idea that a school is so poor it can’t even afford an entire play or story. It’s a bad ‘yo mama’ joke. If that statement about “If you have a copy of the full anthology” isn’t baraggardly, and you’re actually concerned with having students read entire texts (but know their schools can’t afford them) then put the whole freaking text in the cheaper version of the book.

But no, you didn’t do that either. Instead, you turned that screw a little harder. You wrote something akin to:

If your school doesn’t have the anothology, a copy of the play, by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hacket, can be found at most libraries.

Sweet. Thanks for the tip there. Here’s a tip for you: IF you were concerned with saving space in the anthology (which is a fine idea — it means you want to give the students as many opportunities to read many different types of stories), maybe you should have just printed a list of titles in the book and wrote beneath them:

“The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe is a really awesome short story. You can find it online right here, because that story is in the public domain and no one should charge you money in order to read it.

Same thing with O. Henry’s “The Ransom of Red Chief”

Hey kids, searching for things on the internet is fun! If you look hard enough, you can even find a copy of Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes online!

If you can find these amazing short stories online (or in your library!) we’ll bet you’ll have an even easier time finding the poems we’ve supplied as well!

That’s my beef with you McDougal Littell. You print one-third of a text word for word and then tell kids to either find it in a library or to pray-to-god their school has a copy of it lying around somewhere, and at the same time you provide a chunk of stories that can be found in the public domain. If I wanted, I could print off, and make copies for my students, the Poe or Henry stories and by doing so would save a good deal of money. Money I’d gladly give you in place of the missing portion of this play.

Not all of my students thought the play ended at the end of Act 1, Scene 3. As a matter of fact, most of them noticed the play just stopped, and came to class and grabbed the full anthology (thank god we have that!). But once that happened, the green floppy book — the ones we’ve been using as personal books; likely the first Language Arts books our students have taken ownership over — became useless. Way to go.

14 Responses

  1. Wow…I’ve had your blog in Google Reader for awhile now and I’ve consistently amazed–not only at your dedication as a teacher, but also with the sheer volume of reflection you generate. How do you do it?

    Have you seen the recent news about the published letter of Anne Frank’s Dad (http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1582101,00.html)?

    If you have the time, take a look at our class blog.

  2. I know it won’t make up for the missing portion of the text, but I spotted this on the bbc news site and thought your students might like it.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6365861.stm
    Keep your chin up!

  3. Thanks for reminding me of why I hate all textbooks and their manufacturers. I’ve been fighting to have Norton Anthologies in the classroom for the last few years. Expensive, huge, and complete enough that I won’t need to worry about this.

    Probably wouldn’t work for eighth grade, tho. Not sure if it’d work for my juniors…

  4. Thanks Nate! I’m just a fast typist.

    I appreciate the links you and Amy shared with me. AP versions of both those articles showed up in my local paper yesterday and my students pointed them out to me as well.

    RJH: I’d love to have a Norton in the room. But I think you’ve got it right — 8th graders would see all that text and just tune out. The first time I ever encountered a Norton was as a senior in high school, and I instantly knew it was something very different from what I’d seen before.

  5. I’ve been behind on my blog-reading, and just got a chance to catch up on some of your entries. I have to say that I love reading about your Anne Frank lessons. Especially since I read what you wrote last year, and I can now read about your different experiences teaching Anne Frank this year, it’s all really interesting.

  6. Yeah, this year is definitely a different experience. I feel like we’re leaving some things out, but that we’re covering so much more. It’s like starting all over again.

    Thanks for reading the lessons (twice!).

  7. ur a dyke.

  8. i agree with you mcdougal littel must go down

  9. mcdougal litell must go down

  10. mcdougal littel must go down

  11. The minute you said, “green floppy book,” I knew you were talking about the Interactive Reader. This is a companion piece to the Language of Literature anthology. It is meant to be used an extention and interactive part of the lesson. Yes, students mark up the text and practice active reading. It is not, nor was it ever meant to be a stand-alone program. This piece is also helpful to teachers who use Scocratic questioning and/or Padea. It is unfortunate that you did not know this. I am happy to hear that your students are excited about the literature.

  12. Hi there Janet,

    You’re right, I was talking about the Interactive Reader, and I did know that these items are not meant for solo use by the students, and we did use it as a companion to the larger text. My anger came from the fact that even as a companion piece, some works are truncated, specifically the play “The Diary of Anne Frank,” which stops at theend of the first act.

    I’d like to think that if I were to assign any solo reading from this play it would come from the second act, as any background information and any socratic work would be done in the first act — with the second act, we could expect the students to work on their own and to integrate the backgorund information into the reading.

    It just doesn’t make any sense to allow students to Interact with one half of a story but not the other — especially to work in the first half, but not the second — as I can’t think of a single school that would allow the students to do that markup work in the Anthology text (and I can’t think of a Library that would allow this, either).

    I really do think the Interactive readers should work as a complement/supplement to the Anthology, and I realize there are limitations in creating a congruous supplement that isn’t a complete copy of the anthology — but it’s a little disheartening to see a supplementary text make the assumption for the students that their school does not have the anthology.

  13. FYI, you all may be interested in learning that over the past few years, McDougal Littell has been sued at least three times for copyright infringement. The specific three suits I know about were brought by an artist, a photographer and the heir of an artist. In each case, McDougal Littell had purchased a license from the individual artist to reproduce that person’s artwork “40,000″ times in its textbooks. When the artists later found McDougal Littell had kept on goin’, using the images without permission over 1 million times (possibly knowing it would do so), McDougal Littell was sued for infringement and fraud. Of those three cases, it lost one motion to dismiss; one went to arbitration; and one was dismissed for failure to state a claim (I should note it’s not that the claim wasn’t viable, but rather that it was incorrectly pled under the law). Shame on you, McDougal Littell.

Leave a Reply